By logging in to LiveJournal using a third-party service you accept LiveJournal's User agreement
In 1984, she participated in the 5th MBC Riverside Song Festival as a team named '4막 5장' with Im Sung-kyun, senior of the same department of university, and made her debut earning great attention to win the Grand Prize with a song "To J". At that time, she had a perm in a hurry because she was afraid that she might be caught the fact that she competed in the festival without any permission by her parents. That's why she seems so out of place."Ah! The Good Old Days"
When Lee Sun-hee visited the music office of Jang Wook-jo, a South Korean songwriter, in the second year of high school to find a song to sing, a composer named Lee Se-geon was throwing bunch of sheet music away in the garbage can. Sun-hee asked him watching that scene, "Can I use this?", and picked music with his permission. Surprisingly, the song in that music was "To J", her debut and signature song which gave her grand prize of festival. There was a joke that Jeon Doo-hwan, South Korean president at that time, would ban "To J" in radio because the song reminded the nation of the president because his family named starts with 'J'. In fact, this song was used when satirizing the news that always report their president at first.
She was famous for having female fans more than male fans even though she is a woman because of her explosive singing ability and the charm of her boyish attire. It is the beginning of 'sister unit'. At that time, video of her stage performance shows screaming sound of female fans like the sound coming out in the male idol's stage performance by yelling fans nowadays. The size of her sister unit of Lee Sun-hee was so huge, and the power of her sister unit was so great that there was a rumor that the company gave money and mobilized people.
Lee Sun-hee's round glasses and curt hair caused so-called 'Lee Sun-hee syndrome', which was popular among female students at that time. The unique image making that sticks to a course wearing pantsuit costume and her appearance like a shy boy attracted not only male fans but also female fans in 'Lee Sunhee syndrome'. Social atmosphere that rejects the decadent trend set up the environment that singers with healthy image like her can succeed and stretch their wings. Additionally, Lee Sun-hee was able to make herself popular with her unique vocal ability expressing strong power at high notes and songs that stimulate emotions of young women.
快帆speedin下载_快喵vpv安卓_快帆app苹果版本:2 天前 · 快帆加速器下载安装_快帆加速器免费下载安装_18183手机游戏下载 快帆加速器下载安装官方介绍: 快帆华人专用回国加速软件...您可以在全球任何地方获取最快的网络速度。 多平台...中国三大运营商合作,遵守中国法律,通过Speedin无法...
— Peter Baran (@pb14) April 11, 2020
It was a different time
— αℓαη тяєωαятнα ✍︎ (@alantrewartha) April 11, 2020
"I was glad I had seen the cars in this natural setting, which was, after all, a kind of Plato's Republic for teen-agers."
— Frank Kogan (@koganbot) April 11, 2020
--Tom Wolfe, "There Goes (Varoom! Varoom!) That Kandy-Kolored Tangerine-Flake Streamline Baby," Esquire, 1963
The Cars That Go Varoom?
— Tom Ewing (@tomewing) April 11, 2020
We're Tigra and Bunny, and we like Varoom!
— Frank Kogan (@koganbot) April 11, 2020
At age 10 I found the title "Please Please Me" tremendously disturbing; even when I finally figured out the verb things, it still seemed like an irritating unwanted disturbance, like the Beatles themselves.
— Frank Kogan (@koganbot) April 11, 2020
And then eight years later when I became a Kinks fanatic and was excavating their early recordings, my brother felt utter disdain overhearing the lyric, "The only time I feel all right is by your side."
— Frank Kogan (@koganbot) April 11, 2020
Not enough songs about aspiring writers.
— Frank Kogan (@koganbot) March 23, 2020
Better titles:
— Frank Kogan (@koganbot) turbo加速器安卓
Lady Gaga: Bad Romance Novel
Dexy's Midnight Runners: Come Eileen Myles
Better lyrics:
Spice Girls: "If you want my future perfect, forget my past participle"
*Two* tracks I'd never heard! "Blockbuster," wtf, a Yardbirds (via Bowie) imitation I didn't know of? And "Hoots Mon," which is wtf x 10, cod-Scottish-ska big-band what? WTF?
— Frank Kogan (@koganbot) March 18, 2020
Everyone is talking about the last Star Wars movie, a film I will probably see about two years from now (if that), and it’s preemptively disappointing to hear how the one good thing about 加速q器免费 (its scorched-earth boldness re: brand hagiography) gets retconned. But there is already a Disney property that figured this out — Toy Story!
Toy Story 4 is very good as a movie, not quite as good as a movie as at least two of the other Toy Story movies. (Specifically 2 and 3 — I've now seen the first one several times because it is very much my son's speed, and I'm struck not only by how long ago 1995 was from a technology standpoint, but how long ago it was from a plotting and basic "what can you do in a children's movie" standpoint — the movie straight up cheats by the logic it established for itself to resolve its conflict, at least twice!)
But green加速器 also has a throughline argument that is the most convincing I've seen in the series, and takes very seriously the problems and paradoxes that its premise introduces, and follows it to strange places. We see the birth of a toy, the nightmare of being ushered into this weird conceit, a kind of commentary on how the loose fit of analogy to reality creates a gap that you really don't want to look down into. Some folks have talked about Forky and the film more existentially, but I found that a little harder to buy into, even if it's not a huge stretch — to me it's just a kind of stubborn reminder that 安卓加速器, more of a destabilizing of premise than trying to go all in on the analogy and imagine this has something to do with people who are actually, you know, alive. (I'm reminded of Roger Ebert's apoplectic response to A.I. because, like, robots aren't people, which is totally right, even though I think it kind of misses the point of the movie, whatever that is.)
To me it's more of a parable about creativity, characters and situations as "property" to be developed, etc. What do you do when the thing you built just doesn't really make a lot of sense anymore, and the logic that you established doesn't work — a logic that was shaky even in the initial premise (toys are real! But not exactly! Except yes exactly, and they could totally traumatize kids if they wanted to! Except lol no, they can't really do that, just kidding, forget that happened, can you imagine if we let that happen again it would be a horror movie! Also btw there is actual magic! Except no, it's not magic-magic, we still have to obey the laws of physics, that's a bridge too far!)?
What I really liked about Toy Story 4 is how ruthlessly it undermines its own logic, how Forky especially brings out the feeling you get trying to think through that logic for even a minute outside the suspension of your disbelief, but also manages, in making Forky a valuable addition to the movie, in dancing around suspension of disbelief, toying with it, and sticking the landing so that you still want to see the thing resolve. That's an incredibly difficult dance that even masters of meta ambiguity who do it on purpose mess up sometimes, so to see a Pixar movie, the first one after Disney's behemoth of behemoths status was fully secured (I once called Disney an "ever-metastasizing Death Star" and this was like a decade before they bought Star Wars!) not only broach the subject but do something interesting with it was a meta-thrill. (And again, the film's non-meta-thrills aren't quite as thrilling as the last two films.)
I haven't read as much about how (spoiler alerts!) the broader plot and resolution do more audaciously and more confidently what The Last Jedi did in the broadstrokes even though it was a bit too gummily plotted and clunky to get it across beyond conceptually. Woody just straight up abandons his life's purpose, the toy raison d'etre that motivated the action of every other film. He just leaves! And he not only leaves, but he opens up a universe in which there is a teeming subterranean world of abandoned toys who live a life of roiling conflict and earthly pleasure in a precarious nomadic existence! Like, where did that come from!
So the whole universe not only opens up, but sheds its confines completely — Toy Story is now a universe that is only about the toys, with humans as a kind of fringe aristocracy whose role seems to be to subjugate and in some cases literally imprison toys. Had it not been cheating and a conceit quickly abandoned (though flirted with a few times, like in Toy Story 4 when the non-speaker-boxed voice of a toy imitates the GPS navigation voiceover), the Sid resolution of the first film presents a bloody struggle against occasionally benevolent but more often cruel overlords that only a proletarian uprising could address, toys in guerrilla warfare against humans, perhaps a civil war of house toys against street toys.
This is not only an utterly different story but an utterly different universe than the one that the first two (and most of three) films sketch out as being possible. And I would doubt they ever follow up on any of these strands, but if you wanted to start a Toy Story extended universe, there would be worse origin stories to launch another gaggle of intellectual property extenders.
Dave – I'm curious. Did Peter, Paul & Mary's "Puff The Magic Dragon"* ever matter to you? It came at me as a pop song/top 40 song when I was nine, which is to say after I was too old for its plot to mean anything personal to me — so, after I'd lost any personal relationship to any of my childhood toys, teddy bears, etc. I still had elaborate fantasy narratives with toys: matchbox cars, itsy bitsy's,** etc. My friend Jimmy and I would run these fantasy plots where the toys (or matchbox car drivers) would converse with one another and engage in intricate comedic or action adventures. But these were all ad-hoc, weren't based on long-term characters or personalities we'd given to specific toys — though I do recall that when we used the itsy bitsy's I would choose a particular rubber squirrel as my lead character for which I'd do the voice and Jimmy would use a different particular itsy bitsy, a little bear or owl, I think. But it might not have the same character that it had had during a previous afternoon's play, or engage in the same type of adventure.
So "Puff" was just another story amidst the love and lost-love and surf stories and car-crash tragedies that occupied the top 40 during the first half of 1963. But I'm wondering whether, as a viewer of the Toy Stories,*** you found "Puff"'s plot echoing or informing or being informed by the movies — assuming you've heard the song in the first place.
*[I recently posted a "folky" YouTube playlist that I intend to write about someday, but "Puff" didn't make the cut — maybe, in part, because I'd first absorbed it, and PPM's "Blowing In The Wind," on the radio, prior to my conversion to folk music in the summer of 1963, but probably because the PPM track that did make it, "Don't Think Twice, It's All Right" (also a single but its airplay came after I'd abandoned radio, so I absorbed it as an album track, which somehow was a whole different context) strikes me, and struck me even at the time, as deeper and more emotional. If I ever become a diabolical kid-movie animator, though, maybe I'll have Puff sing "Don't Think Twice, It's All Right" to Jackie!]
**[Itsy Bitsy's (or Itzy Bitzy's or -ies) were little rubber animals about an inch-and-a-half high. Jimmy had these wooden blocks with holes and connectors and axles and wheel attachments that we could build into impressive giant ramshackle vehicles. The Itsy Bitsy's would ride atop them, as their drivers/commanders. Incidentally, what I find online while searching "itsy bitsy 1960s rubber toys" are too cute to be the toys I remember; no rubber squirrel, and the bears aren't the bear or owl I remember. EDIT: Ah! When I search "itty bitty 1960s rubber toys" (not "itsy bitsy") I get them: Diener's Itty Bittys Rubber Eraser Toys — though I still don't see no squirrel. Jimmy and I called them Itsy Bitsys — a much better name — though I remember Jimmy telling me once that their official names were Itty Bittys.]
***[I've only seen the Toy Stories — the first three — as a teacher's aide in elementary-school classrooms, which means I've seen bits and pieces but never an entire movie consecutively, so in my mind their plot points and characters intermix.]
I seem to be subconsciously looking for the closest thing I can find to the vibe of “My Teenage Dream Ended” each year (last year it was Jenny Wilson's EXORCISM).
This year it appears to be 安卓加速器, which is very brief and very good.
Dave, I just checked YouTube to find that Farrah Abraham has taken down all her vids from My Teenage Dream Ended. Still has "Blowin'," a more conventionally song-like track from a couple of years later, and she continues to put vlogs and the like on her YouTube channel (some contributed by her daughter, she says on her "About" page). Haven't explored them yet. [EDIT: It's possible that there's some other explanation for the absence of the videos than "Farrah Abraham has taken down all the vids." But I can't think of what another explanation would be, since I don't know who else would or could take them down or if someone else could claim some authority or ownership over them. Publisher? MTV?]
My guess is that, unfortunately, she must have internalized all the criticism and hatred that was thrown at her for her absolutely odd and original music. The music's still up in bits and pieces, posted by one fan here, another there, sometimes creating their own videos. In the meantime, no one's made music like it, before or since.
(I realize that it's hard to explain or justify that last sentence, since any description I'd give — "singing, but not melodically, the words being scraps of images, confession, events, feelings, some rhythm but no attempt at meter or rhyme" — could describe at least some, for instance, spoken word, improv, jazz poetry, hip-hop (the latter probably something of an inspiration; she may be an outsider but that doesn't mean she's from Mars*). So the conception isn't radical. She's not going rhythmically against meter and line, it's just that her rhythms and repetition don't come from there, come from speech instead, but with dancebeat music backing her she's not constrained by the coherence of normal conversation either; nor by poetry. So it's the result that's radically different.)
(Dave and I once talked about some related Farrah issues on LiveJournal ("I'm In With The Out Crowd"), and Dave and lots of others talked about her all over the place at the time, Dave even getting a piece into The Atlantic.)
*And it wouldn't hurt modern Soundcloud rappers to give her a listen. I bet you some would get ideas.
Sexxy Red: "I was just playin when I did it. And I recorded it and everybody was laughin at me. In the studio when I recorded it I'm like, "This isn't— what's funny?"
Princess Stormm: "I'm dead ass!"
2018 my favorite idol-like tracks were not K-pop but Q-pop from Kazakhstan: Ninety One "Ah!Yah!Ma!" KeshYou & Baller "Swala La La," Crystals "Неге мен?" Off-year for K-pop or just my hearing of it? /1 @MargaretMayHan
— Frank Kogan (@koganbot) January 21, 2019
Best K-pop track TheEastLight. "Don't Stop" will forever have asterisk due to bandmembers' saying producer hit and derided them. Other fave K-pop LOOΠΔ/Olivia Hye ft Jin Soul "Egoist," Pungdeng-E "Caramel Macchioto," Stray Kids "Grrr," NCT U "Baby Don't Stop" /2 @MargaretMayHan
— Frank Kogan (@koganbot) January 21, 2019
2018 K-pop cont'd Royal KD "Swagchy," Hey Girls "Follow Me," The Boyz "Right Here," Sunmi "Siren," BTS nonsingles "So What" "Anpanman" & "Airplane Pt. 2" But most exciting Korean music probably hip-hop: Jvcki Wai, Kid Milli, NO:EL, Young B, Swings "Work Out"… /3 @MargaretMayHan
— Frank Kogan (@koganbot) January 21, 2019
…Jvcki Wai "Enchanted Propaganda" & "dOgMa," Jay Park ft 2 Chainz "SOJU" (only scratches surface, so much K-hip-hop I haven't heard) More Korea: Wonderful Machine "Time's Gone" lounge indie; Hong Jinyoung "Good Bye" trot (ditto barely even pawing at surface) /end @MargaretMayHan
— Frank Kogan (@koganbot) January 21, 2019